Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited v. AMUL Canada, 2021 FC 636

International Name Plate Supplies Limited v. Marks & Clerk Canada, 2021 FC 611

Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v. Navsun Holdings Ltd. and 6178235 Canada Inc.

Patterned Concrete Mississauga Inc. v Bomanite Toronto Ltd., 2021 FC 314

RE/MAX, LLC v. Save Max Real Estate, Inc., 2021 CanLII 53761 (FC)

This decision dealt with a motion brought by Munchkin Inc. and Munchkin Baby Canada, Ltd. (collectively, “Munchkin”), the defendants in the main action, to strike certain testimony of two witnesses presented by the plaintiffs, Angelcare Canada Inc., Edgewell Personal Care ULC and Playtex Products, LLC (collectively, “Angelcare”) at trial.

Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario (“CPA Ontario”) appealed, under section 56 of the Trademarks Act, a decision of the TMOB made on behalf of the Registrar of Trademarks rejecting CPA Ontario’s opposition to an application for the mark THIS WAY TO CPA (the “Mark”) filed by the respondent, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”).

This decision concerned a motion to appeal a Prothonotary’s order to strike several paragraphs of the Defendant’s Statement of Defence (“Defence”) without leave to amend.

Janssen brought this infringement action against Apotex pursuant to section 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. The patent at issue, the ‘422 Patent, related to the combination of abiraterone acetate [AA] and prednisone [PN] for the treatment of prostate cancer.

This was an action for infringement of Canadian Patent 2,800,746 (the 746 Patent). The patent is related to pressure assisted oil recovery. Swist alleged that MEG’s use of its heavy oil extraction methods infringed the 746 Patent. MEG counterclaimed that the 746 Patent was invalid.