The Applicants in this case sought three outcomes: 1) to have three inventors added as named co-inventors on a Canadian patent where only one inventor was listed previously; 2) to have an entity (“Koroyd SARL”) added as a co-owner of the Canadian patent; and 3) to have the name of the currently registered owner (“Smith Optics, Inc.”) of that patent replaced with its correct legal name (“Smith Sport Optics, Inc.”).

This decision relates to an action under subsections 7(b), (c), and (d) of the Trademarks Act, with respect to the unregistered trademark, “WANAKOME.” The action also involved a challenge to a defendant’s copyright registration for the artistic work used in the Wanakome logo.

This decision pertains to an application for copyright infringement. Justice Zinn dismissed the application.

The Attorney General of Canada (AGC) sought summary judgment against the Plaintiff, Blacklock’s Reporter (BR), which launched an action against Parks Canada. BR is an Ontario-based online news corporation which offered subscription-based articles on its website, covering politics, legislation, parliamentary committees, federal bureaucracy and courts.

The Appellant, Promotion in Motion, Inc. (“PIM”), appealed the decision of the Trademarks Opposition Board refusing its trademarks applications for SWISSKISS and SWISSKISS & Design [the “SWISSKISS Trademarks”]. The opposition was brought by Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC [Hershey], who opposed the applications based mainly on its registered KISSES trademark (TMA733,263) and KISS trademark (TMA833,060).

The Applicant filed a Notice of Application to have the Respondent’s trademarks expunged in early 2017. In 2023, the Respondent sought an order under Rule 167 of the Federal Courts Rules (the “Rules”) to dismiss the underlying Notice of Application for delay, asserting substantial delays were attributable to the Applicant or its counsel or both. After considering three periods of delay, the Court granted an order to dismiss the Applicant’s expungement Application.

This case concerned Alexa Translations, the plaintiff, which provided translation and language interpretation services using a proprietary AI Platform. This AI platform was tailored for various Canadian sectors including legal, financial and securities. Alexa Translations owned the trademark “ALEXA TRANSLATIONS” as well as other unregistered trademarks.

The appellants (“Eli Lilly Canada” and others) brought an infringement claim against each of the respondents for infringement of the appellants’ patent (the “784 Patent”) relating to CIALIS tadalafil. The respondents brought a motion for summary trial, alleging that the asserted claims of the 784 Patent were invalid for overbreadth and insufficiency.

The Plaintiff Seylynn (North Shore) Development Limited Partnership (“Seylynn LP”) and the Defendants to the Counterclaim Seylynn (North Shore) Properties Phase II Limited Partnership, Denna Development Corp., and Denna Properties Corp. (“Seylynn Group”), brought a motion in writing for an order that the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim, Abo Taheri (“Taheri”), serve and file an accurate and complete Affidavit of Documents.

The Defendants moved for an order to compel the Plaintiff to provide answers to certain discovery questions and to strike the statements of defence to counterclaim of Ms. Wan Ling Leung and Mr. Edbert Joaquin. The Court resolved issues regarding outstanding answers with reasons given at the hearing, while the issue of striking the pleading was reserved.