Articles

CBA Members

Propriété
intellectuelle

Section du droit de la propriété intellectuelle de l’ABC

Les articles de la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle de l’ABC sont publiĂ©s par la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle. Les membres qui souhaitent proposer des articles sont invitĂ©s Ă  les envoyer Ă  la section Ă  : droitproprieteintellectuelleABC@cba.org.

AujourdĘĽhui
AujourdĘĽhui

Case Summary: Federal Court dismisses Section 56 appeal of TMOB’s decision to refuse application to register the trademark TRULY CANADIAN CERIFIED GOLD and Design

  • 19 aoĂ»t 2021
  • William S. Foster

Appeal under Section 56 of the Trademarks Act by Beverly Hills Jewellers MFG Ltd. (the “Applicant”) of the Trademarks Opposition Board’s (“TMOB”) decision to refuse its application to register the composite trademark TRULY CANADIAN CERIFIED GOLD & Design (the “GOLD Mark”):

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Don’t get the munchies

  • 19 aoĂ»t 2021
  • Shaun B. Cody

The Subway branded sandwich restaurant chain brought an action to enjoin use of “Budway” along with a logo adopted to resemble Subway’s trademark logos. Subway alleged that the Budway trademark infringed its registered trademark and amounted to both passing off and depreciation of goodwill. The Court agreed and provided injunctive relief along with an award of damages and costs.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Federal Court confirms that facts cannot be copyrighted

  • 19 aoĂ»t 2021
  • Homira Haqani

This motion for summary judgment involved the Canadian author, Thomas P. Kelley’s (“Kelley”) 1954 book The Black Donnellys and its sequel Vengeance of the Black Donnellys. The works recounted a famous fight in 1875 in Lucan, Ontario, over a land dispute and long-lasting feud.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Federal Court Finds HOSTESS Trademark Valid and Infringed in Summary Trial

  • 19 aoĂ»t 2021
  • David Bowden

This decision relates to an action commenced by Boulangerie Vachon Inc (“Vachon”) and its affiliates against Silvano Racioppo (the “Individual Defendant”) and companies for which he acts as principal, including Natural Stuff Inc. and Hostess Bread Company Inc. (collectively, the “Corporate Defendants”). In the action – which proceeded via summary trial in Federal Court – the Plaintiffs alleged infringement, passing off, and depreciation of goodwill in the HOSTESS trademark by the Defendants.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Federal Court refuses to accept reply expert reports

  • 19 aoĂ»t 2021
  • David Chapman

This decision concerned a motion by the plaintiff (PSET) to file reply expert reports in an ongoing patent infringement action. PSET argued that these reply reports were necessitated by new evidence introduced by the defendants’ (Google) responding expert reports.

Propriété intellectuelle