Articles

CBA Members

Propriété
intellectuelle

Section du droit de la propriété intellectuelle de l’ABC

Les articles de la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle de l’ABC sont publiĂ©s par la Section du droit de la propriĂ©tĂ© intellectuelle. Les membres qui souhaitent proposer des articles sont invitĂ©s Ă  les envoyer Ă  la section Ă  : droitproprieteintellectuelleABC@cba.org.

AujourdĘĽhui
AujourdĘĽhui

Case summary: Federal Court orders damages for trademark infringement on a motion for default judgment

  • 03 mai 2022
  • Michal Kasprowicz

UBS Group AG (UBS) sought default judgment in a trademark infringement action to enforce its UBS family of registered marks against a corporate defendant, Unified Business Solutions Group, as well as its directors. Unified Business Solutions Group was using a design that incorporated an abbreviated version of its name – UBS – in association with financial services.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: The Federal Court of Appeal rules no copyright infringement of jewelry designs

  • 03 mai 2022
  • Homira Haqani

In this Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) decision, the Appellant, Pyrrha Design Inc., (“Pyrrha”) brought a copyright infringement claim against the Respondent, Plum and Posey Inc. (“Plum and Posey”), arguing that the Respondent had infringed its designs of jewelry that resembled wax seal impressions.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Pharmascience Inc. v. Teva Canada Innovation

  • 03 mai 2022
  • David Laurie

In 2020, the Federal Court heard the trial of two patent infringement actions commenced under the PM(NOC) Regulations, concerning whether Pharmascience would infringe Teva’s two patents for COPAXONE 40 mg by entering the market with its generic version, GLATECT 40 mg.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case summary: Section 31 exemption only applies to retransmitters

  • 03 mai 2022
  • David Laurie

The defendants are a group of companies, which together developed a system that provides the retransmission of television content, including TVA and TVA sports, in hotel rooms via a private network. In this action, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants infringed their copyright by broadcasting the TVA and TVA sports channels without their authorization.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Unreliable evidence resulted in invalidation of trademark registration

  • 03 mai 2022
  • Hung Nguyen

iSpring filed an application to register APEC WATER for water treatment devices on April 23, 2015. It claimed a date of first use in Canada since August 4, 2012. Its application was advertised on September 21, 2016 and registered on April 26, 2017. On November 21, 2019, Advanced applied to register its trademark APEC WATER and learned of iSpring’s registration.

Propriété intellectuelle

Case Summary: Federal Court applies the competence-competence principle, stays proceeding in favour of arbitration in Bermuda

  • 03 mai 2022
  • David Schnittker

This was an appeal by the Defendants of a decision by case management judge (“CMJ”) Milczynski. The CMJ dismissed their motion to stay the Plaintiffs’ copyright infringement action in favour of arbitration in Bermuda. On appeal, the Court found that the CMJ erred in law, and granted the stay of proceedings.

Propriété intellectuelle