Trade Clippings - July 14 to July 20, 2014

  • July 21, 2014

Dear International Trade and Investment Committee Members, 

Here are the international trade and investment articles and publications of interest for the week of July 14 to July 20. Andrew Lanouette has curated this week’s edition. Andrew is International Trade Counsel at Cassidy Levy Kent in Ottawa, practising in the areas of international trade law and public procurement. He is also the Co-Chair of the International Trade and Investment Committee.

News

“Japan says Trans-Pacific Partnership regional free trade talks agree broadly on labour, health issues”, Australia News Network (14 July 2014)

  • Pacific trade talks have reached broad agreement on labour issues and sanitary and phytosanitary standards but some difficult aspects remain to be tackled, Japan's chief negotiator said on Saturday.

Office of United States Trade Representative, “WTO Panel Issues a Mixed Result in China’s Challenge to U.S. Countervailing Duties” (14 July 2014)

  • United States Trade Representative Michael Froman announced today that a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement panel issued a mixed result in a broad challenge brought by China against various aspects of 17 separate countervailing duty investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Jeff Gray, “Eli Lilly NAFTA challenge ‘without merit’, Ottawa says”, The Globe and Mail (14 July 2014)

  • Ottawa says a $500-million NAFTA challenge launched by U.S. drug giant Eli Lilly and Co. against Canada over its patent-law regime is “wholly without merit” and should be tossed out.

Robert Evans, “WTO faults U.S. over duties on Chinese, Indian steel goods”, Reuters (15 July 2014)

  • World Trade Organisation judges said on Monday the United States broke its rules in imposing hefty duties on Chinese steel products, solar panels and a range of other goods that Washington argues enjoyed government subsidies.

Manoj Kumar, “India says progress on food condition for Bali deal implementation”, Reuters (15 July 2014)

  • India's top trade official said the government would not block the world's first global trade deal over lack of progress on food subsidy talks, clarifying New Delhi's stance after an earlier threat to derail the deal.

Julius Melnitzer, “CBSA announces latest audit targets”, Financial Post (16 July 2014)    

  • The Canada Border Services Agency has announced its semi-annual trade verification targets for the rest of 2014. The list includes new targets for tariff classification and country of origin.

Mercedes Alvaro, “Ecuador, EU Reach Trade Deal”, Wall Street Journal (17 July 2014)

  • Ecuador and the European Union reached a trade agreement on Thursday, which supporters say will allow the Andean nation to increase its exports to the European bloc by at least $500 million in the next three years.

Reuters, “Canada wholesale trade jumps to record $52.58 billion, smashing forecasts”, Financial Post (18 July 2014)

  • Canadian wholesale sales jumped by an unexpectedly high 2.2% in May from April to a record $52.58 billion, Statistics Canada data indicated on Friday.

Canadian Press, “Investment rules and GMO invasion fears stall US EU free trade talks indefinitely”, Stockhouse (19 July 2014)

  • Visions of chlorine-drenched chickens and the prospect of genetically modified ``Frankenfood'' invading dinner tables across the European Union are proving serious impediments to the signing of a sweeping free trade agreement between the United States and the 28-country bloc.

Matt Siegel, “Concerns mount over India’s stance on global trade pact”, Reuters (19 July 2014)

  • Eleventh hour negotiations to win Indian approval for a breakthrough global trade pact may not have succeeded in the end despite initial signs of progress, sources involved in the discussions said on Saturday.

Commentaries

Dan Ikenson, “U.S. Abides Global Trade Rules...Just Ignore The Steel Protectionism, Antidumping Abuse, WTO Violations, Etc.”, Forbes (16 July 2014)

  • Politicians and protectionists have been served by the enduring myth that the United States is the most open market in the world and its government earnestly adheres to the rules of trade, while others, intent on exploiting U.S. naivety, cheat and pursue state-sponsored mercantilism. Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown is both a politician and a protectionist, so he was probably twice as tickled by Friday’s U.S. Department of Commerce determination that South Korean exporters are dumping “Oil Country Tubular Goods” (OCTG) – a class of steel products used primarily in oil and gas well projects – in the U.S. market.

Matthew Dalton, “Did Juncker Oppose Investor Tribunals in the U.S.-EU Trade Deal?”, Real Time Brussels (16 July 2014)

  • Did Jean-Claude Juncker just come out against including “investor-state dispute settlement” in the trade deal now under negotiation between the U.S. and the European Union? That issue – the creation of a system for foreign investors to challenge what they believe is unfair treatment by the host government of their investment – has become one of the most controversial points in the negotiations.