Message from the Editor
This edition of the e-newsletter summarizes 26 orders in intellectual property cases issued by the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal between January 1 and March 31, 2015.
Our thanks to the reviewers including Lisa Bruni, Philip Goldbach, Ruth M. Corbin, Hung Nguyen, Shaun B. Cody, Katheryn May, Cindy Bélanger, James Green, Katie L. Wei, Bria M. Brown, Alan Macek, John Lucas, Rosamaria Longo, Christopher Heer, Cheryl Cheung, David Wood, Kiernan A. Murphy, Ken Clark, Etienne de Villiers, Peter W. Choe, David Potter and Greg Beach.
If you become aware of a decision issued by either court in the period that is not reviewed please advise us and we will include it in the next quarter.
The next edition of the case summary service will be covering cases for the period of April 1 to June 30, 2015.
Chantal Saunders Chair, Newsletter Committee, National Intellectual Property Section
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Direct dial: 613-369-4783
IP Day 2015: Discussion, Debates and Dinner
IP Day 2015 was a tremendous success. Chief Justice Crampton and Justice Manson led an engaging Town Hall discussion with presentations from Justice Hughes, Justice Locke, Prothonotary Tabib, and Prothonotary Lafrenière. The Federal Court provided an update on Federal Court issues, including an update on the Rules Committee (and the various subcommittees thereto), prothonotary compensation and replacement, workload and scheduling, and the ongoing strategic plan.
The afternoon professional development session commenced with retired federal court justice Judith Snider as the luncheon speaker where she presented her insightful and witty Top 10 Tips for Litigators. This was followed by the IP Debates, which returned by popular demand. The IP Debates are a series of engaging and entertaining debates amongst various members of the Intellectual Property Bar.
The day’s grand finale was the Federal Courts Judges’ Dinner, honouring the extraordinary accomplishments of The Honourable John Evans and Mr. Bruce E. Morgan upon their retirements from the Courts and the Intellectual Property Bar. Pictures of the 2015 gala event can be viewed on the CBA Flickr page.
The IP Section Executive thanks and congratulates everyone who contributed to the success of IP Day, particularly the Federal Courts for their involvement with the Town Hall, John Cotter, Chair of the IP PD Committee, and Christopher Van Barr, Chair of the Court Practice Committee.
Don’t miss out on next year! Mark May 12 in your calendars now as the date for IP Day 2016.
Call for Committee Members
The National IP Section is seeking participation in its biotechnology and patent committees. Please contact staff liaison Inika Anderson if interested.
LinkedIn: All members are welcome to join our CBA Intellectual Property LinkedIn Group.
Intellectual Property Section article:
Message from the Editor
Editor Chantal Saunders introduces the Section’s quarterly rundown of case summaries. This edition of a regularly feature from the Intellectual Property Section summarizes 27 orders in intellectual property cases issued by the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal between October 1 and December 31, 2014.
Winner of 2015 Law School Essay Competition
Congratulations Pradeepan! Pradeepan Sarma of McGill University, Faculty of Law, is the winner of the 2015 CBA National Intellectual Property Law School Essay Competition for his paper entitled, “Aereo Dynamics: ‘User Rights’ and the Future of Internet Retransmission in Canada”. Pradeepan will be recognized for his work at the IP Debates during IP Day in Ottawa.
Read the winning paper
Top 5 IP issues of 2014
The last year has been a busy one for IP lawyers – from advising on new anti-spam legislation to observing passage of a new Combatting Counterfeiting bill. Toronto lawyer Mala Joshi takes us through the currents of change in 2014.
Top 5 IP trends to watch for in 2015
Toronto lawyer Mala Joshi lets us know what to watch for in the year ahead.
Request for Action: Please contact your MPs re: Bill C-31, Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1, Part 6 Division 25 – Trade-marks Act amendments
We seek your assistance. Please contact your local MP to request that the impugned sections of Bill C-31 which impact the Trade-marks Act and Regulations implementing them be deferred or struck from the legislation altogether.
As many of you are aware, Bill C-31, among other things, fundamentally changes the nature of Canadian Trade-mark law. Of particular concern is the fact that Bill C-31 will allow an applicant for a trademark to obtain a registration without any requirement to use the trademark in Canada or elsewhere. To our knowledge there were never any specific consultations with any interested parties on the effect of these amendments. Although the CBA Intellectual Property Section made a formal submission and the Section appeared before the relevant Parliamentary subcommittee this past Spring, the Bill received Royal Assent in June 2014 without further amendment.
We are continuing our efforts to convince the government that the provisions of Bill C-31 relating to trademark use should not be proclaimed into force and deferred, pending full consultation with interested parties.
At this late stage in the legislative process, the steps that can be taken are limited. On behalf of the CBA Intellectual Property Section, Trade-marks Sub-Committee, we ask that you please contact your local MP and express your concerns regarding the substance and implementation of Bill C-31. Please email John McKeown, chair of the Trade-marks Subcommittee at email@example.com if you would like further details about this initiative.
Intellectual Property Quarterly Case Summaries
Updated Case Summaries are now available: January 1 to March 31, 2015
CBA National Intellectual Property Section on LinkedIn
In order to create networking opportunities and a forum for discussion and exchange on subjects relevant to our Section, we have recently created a group on LinkedIn. This professional networking site allows you to establish connections with other professionals interested in Intellectual Property law, share cases and accomplishments, and will provide the Section with another means to keep you up to date on Section activities. We look forward to meeting you on LinkedIn.
Opportunities for Involvement
General call for committee members
The Intellectual Property Section committees provide Section members with the opportunity to comment on proposed changes to legislation and regulatory policies, keep abreast of developments in intellectual property law and to network with others with similar interests. The Section committees depend on the contribution of Section members to deliver relevant services to members and to prepare submissions to legislative and regulatory bodies that reflect the full range of member perspectives.
View the mandate and current members of all Section committees.
We welcome you to join our committees by sending an e-mail to the Section, with indication of your reasons for wishing to join, acknowledgement of the committee mandate and guidelines (as posted on the CBA website), and an express acknowledgement that by applying, you are willing and able to be an active participant of that particular committee.
Committee Guidelines have been introduced in an attempt to encourage participation and increase productivity. These guidelines seek to maintain fair and transparent criteria for selection of Committee members.
View the Committee Guidelines.
More CBA Submissions
Recent issues of the Business and Corporate Bulletin - from CBA PracticeLink and National Magazine.