Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia About   Articles Registry   Contact   Directory   Events   Join/Renew   Public/Media  


advanced search

CBA.org Home

 

Knocking Down Silos
Bar Moves
Letters to the Editor
From the President
Executive Director
Practice Talk
Nothing Official
On the Web
Sections
Legislative Update
Executive Committee 2008/2009
CBA – Task Force on Conflicts of Interest Report
Duty of Loyalty to an Affiliate of a Client
Lawyer Referral Service
Tilting Against Giants…
Events
Provincial News
National News
Member Services
Partners
Membership
Back to Archive


 Practice Talk - Conflicts

Taking a systems approach

by David J. Bilinsky

Time and time again we hear the same old rumours
Conflict doing this,
Conflict doing that...
Words and music by Conflict.

Discovering you have a conflict of interest on a file can be more than just embarrassing. It can have ethical, professional and financial implications. It can damage your relationship with your client when they realize the file must be moved. It can also result in the loss of a substantial amount of future work that may have come your way (an economic loss of opportunity). With all of this at stake, it is surprising that conflicts are not afforded, to paraphrase Rodney Dangerfield, more respect.

There are three distinct parts to unearthing conflicts before they become a problem. These are:

  1. Awareness
  2. Procedure
  3. System

Taking each in turn:

Awareness: This is recognizing that you are responsible (legally and professionally) with the task of determining whether or not you and your firm may have a conflict of interest at any point in time, but particularly whenever taking on a new client. There are several types of conflicts:

  1. Conflicts of interest between clients
  2. Conflicts which arise when acting for two or more clients
  3. Conflicts arising as a transfer between or merger of firms
  4. Conflicts between lawyer and client
  5. Conflicts which arise as a result of new case law and/or changes to Rules and Regulations.

Procedure: Every firm should have a written office manual which outlines the process to be followed to discover a conflict of interest. Unfortunately, no procedure or system has yet to be devised that will uncover every conflict of interest. Having a written procedure to follow at least ensures that you go about the process of discovery in a systematic and consistent basis. Furthermore, the steps that were taken should be recorded in order that the procedure undertaken can be demonstrated, should it become necessary to do so.

System: Relying on the lawyer’s (or legal assistant’s memory) never was a reliable and dependable system to uncover a conflict of interest. Furthermore, having a written or increasingly, computerized conflict checking database will only discover conflicts between clients and only if names have not changed. This database check will not necessarily uncover conflicts that arise as a result of the exercise of legal judgement.

For example, s. 2 of Chapter 7 of the Professional Conduct Handbook (PCH) states:

“2. A lawyer must not perform any legal services for a client with whom or in which the lawyer or any-one, including a relative, partner, employer, employee, business associate or friend of the lawyer, has a financial or membership interest that would reasonably be expected to affect the lawyer’s professional judgement.”

Many lawyers do not have a written retainer agreement which outlines the steps to be taken in the event that they are working for two or more clients and a conflict arises between them. Such a situation typically results in the law firm being unable to act for any of them when a conflict arises.

Furthermore, there appears to be considerable confusion as to what is a “simple conveyance” in accordance with Appendix 3 (Real Estate Transactions) to the PCH. It is respectfully suggested that this Appendix be reviewed periodically in order to keep awareness at the forefront of a lawyer’s mind.

Lawyers should call the Practice Advice Department at the Law Society if they desire an objective and disinterested opinion as to whether or not they are in a conflict of interest.

There is one thing that is certain and that is no firm wishes to have rumours on the street that they were in a conflict doing this or a conflict doing that and had to get off a file as a result.

David J. Bilinsky is the Practice Management Advisor for the Law Society of British Columbia. E-mail: info@thoughtfullaw.com; Blog: www.thoughtfullaw.com

Technology Tip from Dave’s Award-Winning Blog: www.thoughtfullaw.com
I have been a fan of OnPoint Law Corporation’s “Take Five Newsletter” for some time. This free monthly resource summarizes five key cases from the British Columbia Court of Appeal in a clean, easy to read e-mail. The latest version (August 2008) dealt with the Robertson v. Slater Vecchio case (http://tinyurl.com/6beb8v) regarding firewalls when lawyers transfer between firms and the implementation of the Law Society’s conflict guidelines in this regard.

Hats off to Sarah Picciotto and the rest of her legal research team at OnPoint Law Corporation! She is at the forefront of lawyers using off-site contract services in a cost-effective manner. You can subscribe to the Take Five newsletter by sending an e-mail to: spicciotto@onpointlaw.com. It’s alright – just take five!


This article originally appeared in the October 2008 issue of BarTalk and is reproduced here with permission of both the author and the Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia Branch.


 

   Copyright © 2010 The Canadian Bar Association

Terms of Use & Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy