Canadian Bar Association, British Columbia About   Articles Registry   Contact   Directory   Events   Join/Renew   Public/Media  


advanced search

CBA.org Home

 

Lawyer-Client Privilege Protected
From the President
Executive Director
Section Talk
Practice Talk
On the Web
Legislative Update
Administrative Justice Project
Lifestyles
Snapshots
Awards
Executive Committee 2002/2003
Events
Letter to the Editor
Member Services
Provincial News
National News
Kamloops Land Title Office
Pro bono Opportunity
BC Courthouse Library Society
Law Foundation of BC
Lawyers Assistance Program
Supreme Court of BC
Back to BarTalk Archive


 Supreme Court of British Columbia

BarTalk October 2002
Volume 14, Number 5

Notice to the Profession


Calderbank settlement letters (September 18, 2002)
The Supreme Court Rules Revision Committee seeks input from the bar about possible changes to Rule 37 which governs offers to settle to allow for the continued use of Calderbank letters where appropriate. Committee members have expressed a desire to retain Calderbank letters. While the committee may decide against any action, two options are under consideration:

  1. a new sub-rule could be added specifically preserving the Calderbank procedure in cases where Rule 37 cannot be used; or

  2. repeal Rule 37 and replace it with a codified form of Calderbank letters.

Please address any suggestions or comments on the options identified in writing to: The Supreme Court Rules Revision Committee: Attention Judith Hoffman, Vancouver Law Courts, 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2E1 no later than January 15, 2003.

The full Notice to the Profession is available at www.courts.gov.bc.ca/sc


This article was published in the October 2002 issue of BarTalk and is subject to the copyright by the British Columbia Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, 2005, all rights reserved.


 

   Copyright © 2008 The Canadian Bar Association

Terms of Use & Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy